Calçoene – the Brazilian Stonehenge?
A loose translation of the news story at O Globo greatly assisted by Google because my Portuguese is awful.
Archaeologists have discovered in a remote region of Amapá what seems to be the biggest astronomical observatory in pre-Columbian Brazil. The observatory is formed by 127 granite megaliths, some up to 3 metres tall, distributed at regular intervals in a clearing 16km from Calçoene and 390km from Macapá.
The archaeologists say that only a society with a complex culture could have built the monument. For them the finding challenges the notion that no such societies ever developed in Amazônia.
For the time being, it is impossible to date the observatory. But, the researchers say, it is between 500 and 2000 years old. The estimate was based on found pottery fragments next to megaliths. However, only with the excavations starting now will it be possible to know the age of the observatory.
The archaeologist Mariana Petry Cabral, of the Institute of Scientific and Technological Research of the State of the Amapá (Iepa), said that the monument was known for the local population has many years, but never had been studied. The importance of the stones was recognized when technicians of the Iepa and the Secretariat of Industry, Commerce and Mining had been to carry out an economic survey of the area and noticed the alignment of the stones.
Mariana says that the place would have to be some sort of of temple and could have been used as astronomical observatory. Already they have found that the stones mark the winter solstice and that in December the Sun accurately rise over one of the stones.
It is thought the ancient peoples of Amazônia watched the position of the stars and the phases of the Moon to plant and to conduct religious rituals.
For the researchers of the Iepa, the monument of the Amapá is the Stonehenge of the Amazônia – an allusion to the megalithic complex of Stonehenge, in Salisbury, south of England. Stonehenge is a megalithic site and would have been built 5000 years ago. Even now its function is unknown nor who built it. The way the enormous rocks were brought to Stonehenge also remains a mystery.
The monument of Amazônia holds the same mysteries. The archaeologists do not know which people could have constructed it or from which age it dates. The technology used to cut and to carry the rocks to the site and place them in a circle is also unknown.
The researchers of Iepa assume that the rocks had been taken by boat and had arrived at the place by a branch of the river known as the Rego Grande.
Note: From the reports, also in English at the BBC, ABC and Yahoo!, it’s hard to tell if this is going to be a major find or not. Some parts of the story bother me. For instance if you have 127 stones evenly distributed in a circle then how likely is it that the sun will rise or set over one of them at a solstice of equinox? A plan of the site might tell you more about how deliberate the alignment is, but that work hasn’t been done yet. So a part of me is tetchy – if archaeologists released news on all the things they’re going to do then there’d be no space ever for the things that were actually done.
On the other hand Amazonia is an archaeologically neglected region. Some people do work there, but the vast bulk of attention goes to the glamourous sites in the Andes. I think one reason there’s little evidence of complex society is that the survey hasn’t been done. The Amazon rainforest is not an easy place to survey. Nevertheless when forest clearance finally removes it I think there will be plenty of surprises found. This site, even it turns out to be astronomically dull, could still be significant in overturning ideas about the development of societies in South America. There are hints that there were some amazing things there – Francisco de Orellana didn’t travel past savages – so it’s not possible to rule out that Calçoene, or other sites to be discovered, will have astonishingly complex architecture.
Update: The Peninsula adds -
In December, the path of the sun allows rays to pass through a hole in one of the blocks, possibly to calculate agricultural activity and religious rituals.
Combined with the photo above, or the one used at ABC, that makes the site more interesting. There is a problem of whether the stones have shifted since being set up, which requires excavation, but this would seem to give strength to an astronomical interpretation.
—–

21/07/2006 hey! i went to greencastle hill today- – the quarry guys let me walk through their site and showed me how to get to the top, its a really great place, cool views, reminds me of silbury hill and avebury and glastonbury tor all rolled into one! – i agree that the quarry spoils it and there is no way that place should be destroyed… getting down in the direction of the sunset towards Jennings village was quite a thorny experience but very cool to then take a short bus ride to jolly harbour for a swim, and, whilst swimming in the perfect blue sea, to look back at greencastle hill
I’ve got some great photos too- let me know if anyone wants them and i’ll send them out,
ric (ricgrin3@yahoo.co.uk)
The Brazilian Stonhenge had surely the same function of
the British Stonehenge.
Notice the holes in the stones where a rope could cross in direction of a central shaft.
Henges were Prehistoric cranes to pull heavy loads.
Visit the site http://henges.no.sapo.pt for more information.
Apologies, comments got eaten in the move to the new server. The previous entries including some corrceting me by the archaeologists on site are below.
AUTHOR: John Hardy
Cool! As you say its pretty hard to know the significance of this although from what I understand the use of stone for building was pretty rare in the Amazon. I’d be interested to know where the stone came from and how far it was carried.
You might be interested in this post at Bldgblog about archaeology in the upper Xingu.
AUTHOR: John Hardy
that link again
http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2006/04/z.html
AUTHOR: alun
Thanks, I hadn’t heard of Bldgblog. Orbis Quintus also mentions construction in Beni, Bolivia, which is the lowland side. I’ve also a vague recollection in my mind that there’s stone construction in northern Paraguay.
AUTHOR: Mariana Petry Cabral
I would like to make a few comments on the news about Calçoene, after all I am one of the researchers involved in that, co-directing archaeological research with Joao Saldanha, fellow archaeologist at IEPA (the Institute mentioned on the text). In fact the structure is really impressive, but the stone blocks are not regularly distributed, although they do form a circle. And we do have already done a detailed plan of the site. There is one particular block which is perfectly aligned with the track of the sun during winter solstice (and it is not the block with the hole!), so that its two faces are enlighted, something that only happens during winter solstice. That was the reason we understand this structure as an astronomical observatory, and more research is being carried now on archaeoastronomy for this particular site.
And on the matter of complex societies in the Amazon, many researchers have raised this idea on the last decade, but it is still something very little known by general public. For this particular site, we are just proposing such idea as a working hypothesis, as the site has only been superficially studied. Me and my partner, Joao Saldanha, will be directing archaeological diggings there from August to September, so that we will have more informations to clarify some doubts.
AUTHOR: Arie Boomert
Please, inform me whether this structure is the same as the José Antonio stone alinement in the Calcoene area which was discovered by Nimuendajú in the early and published by Linné in 1928.
AUTHOR: João Saldanha
Dear Arie Boomert!
I´m so glad to contact with you!!!
My name is joão Saldanha, one of the archaeologists that are working here in amapá with this stone alignment.
No, this one is not the José antônio site. This one is arranged in a circle, and is quite well preserved. And also, like you mentioned in your work, we are finding a lot of Aristé pottery (including fragments of anthropomorfic burial jars). If you need more details, you can e-mail me at joao.saldanha@iepa.ap.gov.br
AUTHOR: Antomari Ottavi
Please give my e-mail to Mariana Petry Cabral. I have interesting documents to be communicated to her
From Antomari Ottavi of the Corsican association of archeoastronomy ( ARCA)
For every others:
http://pageperso.aol.fr/__121b_t9FRlL8/zdbSahg/1hnblZomyUfA6/xxNc9bOFoHXNj/oUqY2I7oawDtdsAvjSIkUsViAQUeA7I=
Thank you
AUTHOR: alun
Wow! That sounds much more exciting than the newpaper reports indicated. Thank you Mariana Petry Cabral and João Saldanha for commenting. Please let me me know when the preliminary report is published. I clearly need to start improving my Portuguese.
AUTHOR: Maura P. Imbert
I am very interested in site as i recently investigated as a master in Astronomy project the possible existance of an astronomical outlay of columns on Greencastle Hill in Antigua known to have been inhabited by a pre-Columbian Arawak culture between 500-1200AD.I associated bearings of stones with the azimuths of star groups important in Arawak culture and found that the Sun rose behind a megalith called the Sun God at the Spring Equinox in 1000 AD and that Ursa Major was associated with hurricane season among other correlations.Will such correlations be looked for at the site?
AUTHOR: John Hardy
Yes, Bolivia. I wasn’t aware of Beni but I did read something about using aerial photography to find evidence of intensive agriculture and land forming in the Baures region of Bolivia.
AUTHOR: João Saldanha
I,m so glad to see other studies in pre-columbian sites, like greencastle hill. And we also think that Calçoene site was made by Arawak groups, like the Palikur in northen Amapá.
And yes, we will try star correlations also.
Can you, Maura, send me a copy of your master? where do you live?
AUTHOR: Maura P. Imbert
I live in Trinidad where considerable investigation of Arawak sites is carried out through the Department of Archaeology.I am not, however, an archaeologist, I am a chemist/biochemist with an undying interest in astronomy and its history. The investigation of Greencastle Hill was the first local project in archaeoastronomy.I have tried to find out whether there are any “standing stones” on Trinidadian sites but have not found any so far. Can you give me an address to which I could send details of the work in Antigua? I hope to write a book called “A Tropical Stonehenge?”about Greencastle Hill and have been encouraged to do this By James Cook University which would like me to continue the work into a doctorate.Such a project, however, involves many parameters ( Government approval etc) which would have to be resolved first unless I could find a suitable site in Trinidad.
AUTHOR: Maura P. Imbert
Re my former inputs. Has anybody looked at whether the Pleiades rise behind any of the 127 stones in May-June – the start of the year for Arawak cultures? I have considered the possibility that there may have been a temple dedicated to the Pleiades – a highly important star group to Arawak cultures – on Greencastle Hill and am now seeking ways to continue our investigations.As we are now in June, this would be a good time to see where the Pleiades rise.
AUTHOR: Maura P. Imbert
Another small point. What date is being chosen for the Winter Solstice in Calcoene? The date in 500-1500 AD was not around December 21 as the calendar had not yet been corrected by Pope Gregory X111 in 1582 and if one is noting the alignment of the sun with a particular stone, the correct date at the time in question would be important.
I have a work done on the interpretation of the Trilithons’ Horseshoe at Stonehenge England. I would like to apply the main ideas to this new interesting site, now called Brazilian Stonehenge.
Please let me know if the description of the site is available.
My work on Stonehenge can be seen in the site above.
Calçoene looks like Chinesse.
Because this people were sailing around the world, in some spots they were making these constructions.
They needed to know where they were located.
The ceramics may be are Ming.
Could you inform if the burial sites are inside the circle, or out of it? This is an important information, because if they were outside, the circle is not only an astronomical formation, but algo a religious one.